Walsh D, Devane D. A metasynthesis of midwife-led care. We would not have expected Embase to have contributed so many unique papers nor CINAHL to have made no contribution in terms of unique studies. 2007 [5] tested the recall when searching in a review of patients experiences of living with a leg ulcer. JBI Database Syst Rev Implementation Rep. 2012;10(16):93576. The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. government site. One literature review found that predictors of physician information-seeking behavior included the existence of an urgent patient problem and the expectation that a clear answer existed [3]. CINAHL is The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. Ideally a planned future analysis would be based upon prospective data so these factors and their impact can be considered. Optimal searches in systematic reviews should search at least Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar as a minimum requirement to guarantee adequate Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews. WebMEDLINE is an index of the biomedical journal literature produced by the National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD 20894, Web Policies 2011;127(6):147181. Would you like email updates of new search results? Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE Ease of Use. Experience of rehabilitation following spinal cord injury: a meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Booth et al. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors alone and not those of CRD, the PHRC or the DH. government site. One of the longest periods of coverage: from 1966, with over 11 million records (see 'Bear in mind' below, too.) PMC 2012;12:85. MEDLINE PubMed Answered By: Reference LibrarianMar 29, 2020 55889. The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension. Wright, K., Golder, S. & Lewis-Light, K. What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies?. Data from this study add to the body of literature about MEDLINE, demonstrating that MEDLINE is an effective component in providing answers to clinical questions, as it appears more frequently than any other resource with the exception of journals (print and online), and in effectively changing patient care. Marshall IJ, Wolfe CD, McKevitt C. Lay perspectives on hypertension and drug adherence: systematic review of qualitative research. Study data were examined using descriptive statistics and regression analysis to determine the number of information resources used and how they were used in combination with one another. It is considered that some databases are more useful than others for specific types of review, and CINAHL is generally thought to be a good source to search when conducting a review of qualitative evidence [57]. The percent of respondents who used MEDLINE as one of the resources in their searches among those who reported avoiding adverse events is shown in Table 3. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension. The main objectives are to assess whether BNI is a useful source of UK publications and to consider the implications for information professionals. 2007;17(5):70510. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0069-4, http://phrc.lshtm.ac.uk/project_2011-2016_002.html, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/CRDWeb/AboutPage.asp, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001724.htm, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0128-x, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. Previous research has either focused on the use of MEDLINE as a single resource or has compared the use of MEDLINE with one other resource [12, 13]. BMC Med Res Methodol. A result list of related terms is displayed. Available from. They covered a wide range of topics; there was a small group of seven reviews about pregnancy and childbirth and another smaller group of four reviews exploring older peoples experiences of health and care. CINAHL is a database that indexes journals, books, audiovisuals, (DOCX 14 kb), Number of databases not available for searching. The median % of unique studies was 9.09 %; while the range had a lowest value of 5.0 % to the highest value of 33.0 %. HHS Vulnerability Disclosure, Help MEDLINE's database size is more than 21 million records, whereas CINAHL's database size is more than 3.2 million records. Health Info Libr J. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Furthermore, when physicians do take time to search for an answer to a clinical question, they do not tend to spend much time doing the research (typically 2 to 12 minutes [3]). WebThe study results indicate: there are few differences in the number of major descriptors used, MEDLINE uses almost twice as many descriptors, MEDLINE has almost twice as The site is secure. PubMedGoogle Scholar. Indexing was analyzed by counting the number of major descriptors, the number of major and minor descriptors, the number of indexing access points, the number of common indexing access points, and the number and type of unique indexing access points. PubMed Mortenson WB, Demers L, Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, Lenker J, DeRuyter F. How assistive technology use by individuals with disabilities impacts their caregivers: a systematic review of the research evidence. CINAHL (short for the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature) is one of the largest and most in-depth nursing research databases. This site needs JavaScript to work properly. 1999 Spring;15(2):297-303. Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. The Public Health Research Consortium is funded by the Department of Health Policy Research Programme. The site is secure. It mainly includes the TITLE, ABSTRACT, and AUTHOR-PROVIDED KEYWORDS. MEDLINE as a source of just-in-time answers to clinical questions. In this case study, seven bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, British Nursing Index (BNI), Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), ASSIA and PsycINFO) were searched using three different strategiesone consisting of thesaurus terms, the second composed of free-text terms and the third using broad-based terms. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013 Jan 9;13:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-7. Cinahl Nearly 5,000 journals are read and their individual articles indexed and added to the MEDLINE database, which contains information about over 12 million journal articles. Barroso J, Gollop CJ, Sandelowski M, Meynell J, Pearce PF, Collins LJ. At this stage, 15 [2034] were excluded as they failed one or more of the criteria, leaving us with 33 reviews [11, 3547, 4866] eligible for data extraction. Smithson J, Garside R, Pearson M. Barriers to, and facilitators of, the prevention of unintentional injury in children in the home: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. Harrison Dening K, Jones L, Sampson EL. 2023 Apr 20;18(4):e0284518. 2011;85:31522. We created three sets of variables to assess the relationship between the use of information resources and changes to patient care or avoidance of adverse events. Tong A, Howell M, Wong G, Webster AC, Howard K, Craig JC. MEDLINE versus EMBASE and CINAHL for telemedicine searches Welcome to KEMH Medical Library's Research guide. The three When reviews are being considered for inclusion in DARE, they are also tagged according to type, so we were able to make use of the qualitative review tag in our search strategy (see Fig. Systematic Reviews Lundgren I, Begley C, Gross MM, Bondas T. 'Groping through the fog': a metasynthesis of women's experiences on VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section). HHS Vulnerability Disclosure, Help The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) is generally thought to be a good source to search when conducting a review of qualitative evidence. moc.liamg@28cosbs, Program Manager, MDC, Durham, NC, Joyce E. B. Backus, MSLS, One of the consequences of this choice was that we were reliant upon what was reported in the published papers regarding the searching process such as the databases used, database search strategies, supplementary search techniques applied and whether any of the sources had identified unique studies. Shaw RL, Booth A, Sutton AJ, Miller T, Smith JA, Young B et al. Articles in this journal are licensed under a. Bookshelf Optimal database combinations for literature searches in We found that using a larger number of information resources to answer a clinical question was significantly associated with greater probabilities of making all 8 possible changes to patient care (p<0.05, Figure 2). Extending the analysis to include this additional group of studies could be valuable, if it were possible to identify a sufficiently large group. sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal 2018 Nov 20;7(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0864-9. A similar situation may exist between the synthesized resources found in UpToDate and the primary literature published in journals. and transmitted securely. PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram for the selection of literature, MeSH Lorenc T, Marrero-Guillamon I, Llewellyn A, Aggleton P, Cooper C, Lehmann A, et al. Health Soc Care Community. Google Scholar. MEDLINE is a critical clinical care tool that health care professionals use to avoid adverse events, make changes to patient care, and answer clinical questions. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Marshall JG, Sollenberger J, Easterby-Gannett S, Morgan LK, Klem ML, Cavanaugh SK, Oliver KB, Thompson CA, Romanosky N, Hunter S. The value of library and information services in patient care: results of a multisite study. Key facts of MEDLINE and EMBASE As the aim of a systematic literature search is to find as much published evidence as possible , it is advisable to first consider if searches limited to one database, i.e. The median % of unique studies identified from CINAHL in these 11 reviews was 9.09 %, while the range had a lowest value of 5.0 % and a highest value of 33.0 %. This may not be the complete list of references from this article. The full search strategies used to identify reviews to populate DARE are available at http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/CRDWeb/AboutPage.asp. Article Chi-squared values with corresponding p-values <0.05 indicate that using the information resource or combination of resources is significantly associated with the outcome measures. J Clin Nurs. Syst Rev. J Immigr Minor Health. SG and KL-L carried out data extraction, wrote up the research and commented on all versions of the manuscript. The other 37 (86.0 %) reviews all reported some kind of searching activities in addition to using bibliographic databases. CINAHL stands for Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. Mindfulness. These references are in PubMed. As the number of resources used to answer the clinical question increased, MEDLINE was more likely to be included in the top ten most frequently used combinations of resources. For each review, we extracted the following: review details, publication year, number of included studies, how many databases searched, percentage of potentially included studies available from CINAHL, percentage of unique studies available from CINAHL and whether any other sources were used to identify studies. Predicted probabilities for changes made to patient care (with 95% confidence intervals), depending on the number of information resources used, Predicted probabilities for adverse events avoided (with 95% confidence intervals), depending on the number of information resources used. eCollection 2023. Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews. Qual Health Res. Systematic reviews. Bull Med Libr Assoc. Case studies have suggested that using CINAHL could be essential for reviews of qualitative studies covering topics in the nursing field, but it is unclear whether this can be extended more generally to reviews of qualitative studies in other topic areas. To examine the extent to which using each information resource or combination of resources was associated with the outcome measures (changes to patient care and avoidance of adverse events), we conducted bivariate analysis using chi-squared tests. The lack of time available to physicians contrasts with the number of clinical questions raised during patient encounters. The sample sizes (n) for the bivariate analyses varied based on the number of people who responded to each cross-section of survey questions. official website and that any information you provide is encrypted Disclaimer. This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Systematic review on cost-effectiveness analysis of school-based oral health promotion program. Accessibility The .gov means its official. Using a higher number of information resources was significantly associated with a higher probability of making changes to patient care and avoiding adverse events. [corrected]. While we found some indication that CINAHL had the potential to provide unique studies for systematic reviews, we could only fully test this on a limited number of reviews, so we are less confident about this finding. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Rocio Rodriguez-Lopez carried out some of the initial data extraction. The percent of respondents who used MEDLINE as one of the resources in their searches among those who reported a change made to patient care is shown in Table 2. Next, we examined the extent to which those who used MEDLINE also reported changes in patient care and avoided adverse events as a result of the information they obtained in their searches. Why use CINAHL? Bradley SE, Frizelle D, Johnson M. Patients' psychosocial experiences of attending specialist palliative day care: a systematic review. Reviews that cover the wider determinants of health, such as housing, transport and social care are also included. Syst Rev 4, 104 (2015). Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kleijnen J, Franco OH. Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL) is a bibliographic database that includes the fields of nursing and allied health professions, including cardiopulmonary technology, physical therapy, emergency service, physician assistant, health education, radiological technology, medical/laboratory technology and therapy, Subject indexing of the American Journal of Occupational Therapy in MEDLINE and NAHL. Munn Z, Jordan Z. 2007;57(1):95100. Accessed 18 Jun 2015. a literature review. The British Nursing Index and CINAHL: a comparison of journal search 2012;25(5):36375. Demner-Fushman D, Hauser SE, Humphrey SM, Ford GM, Jacobs JL, Thoma GR. Matern Child Nutr. Mahant S, Jovcevska V, Cohen E. Decision-making around gastrostomy-feeding in children with neurologic disabilities. 2012;3(1):6075. The main objectives are to assess whether BNI is a useful source of UK publications and to consider the implications for information professionals. On the contrary, the search engine of CINAHL site is All authors read and approved the final manuscript. We carried out a retrospective analysis of a sample of systematic reviews of qualitative studies to investigate CINAHLs potential contribution to identifying the evidence. Evidence-based practice. Age Ageing. 2009;19(9):132134. It is one of the most popular databases for finding journal articles on health related topics used by the School of Health and Life Sciences. [68] describes this as Their intention is not to identify all literature on a particular topic. Before MEDLINE The database itself is unfiltered, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews. An official website of the United States government. CINAHL & PubMed - Home - Research Guides at Eastern The small group of reviews investigates topics covering an equally wide range of topic areas as examined by the overall sample as follows: experiences of breastfeeding, old peoples experience of dependency, fathers experience of birth, patient experience of being in isolation, preoperative communication and occupational therapy home visits. The significance of this review is threefold. Two of the most commonly used databases are MEDLINE and EMBASE where MEDLINE is usually preferred due to free access. Similar to previous studies, the Value of Libraries study found that health care providers used an average of 3.5 resources to answer a clinical question [7]. The study results indicate: there are few differences in the number of major descriptors used, MEDLINE uses almost twice as many descriptors, MEDLINE has almost twice as many indexing access points, and MEDLINE and CINAHL provide few common access points. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Database-specific operators and fields - Health Sciences Literature Searching Basics - Guides at McGill Library. When we re-checked these thesaurus terms in 2014 against both the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and the CINAHL thesaurus, we found that there was no substantial change i.e., there were a significant group of terms describing qualitative research that were available in CINAHL but not in MEDLINE. The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) is generally thought to be a good source to search when conducting a review of qualitative evidence. Use the tabs above for advice and support on: Finding the literature.
Eso The Reach Rewards, How To Register A Used Car In Uk, Dri Membership Benefits, Stages Of Living In New York, Articles W